 Posted 02/01/2012 15:56:14
|
|
|
|
http://tahomaclinicblog.com/strontium/#art
This article is interesting if you can get the link to work. I found it posted on the National Osteo. Foundation forum.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL FORUM MEMBERS
Lynne H
|
|
|
Posted 02/01/2012 18:14:41
|
|
|
|
Interesting article Lynne !
I thought this bit good, but wished they'd shown the reference for it:
"Stontium is even safer than placebo
"Of course, I’m sure you’ve heard the warning: “Just because it’s natural doesn’t mean it’s safe.” The medical mainstream loves to toss this one around. While that’s true, it’s also true that the odds are in favor of nature: If you placed bets on the safety of natural substances vs. patent medications, you’d win money nearly every time. But even so, it’s still important to examine the evidence.
"I’ll start with the new patentable strontium combination, strontium ranelate. In the two-year study with recently postmenopausal women using 340 milligrams of strontium, the researchers reported more “adverse events” in the placebo group than in the strontium group. The most common complaints in both groups were diarrhea, nausea, gastritis, and indigestion."
Osteoporosis - Strontium Ranelate, Dekristol vitamin D3 20,000 IU/week, weight lifting, walking and vibration platform exercise, alkaline loaded diet, vitamin K2 MK-7 100mcg/d, K2 MK-4 5mg/d. Diabetes - Repaglinide, low carb diet and exercise. Congenital heart defect - Omacor and CoQ10
|
|
|
Posted 03/01/2012 07:44:01
|
|
|
|
| I thought it was interesting too, but scientists shouldn't get away with saying random, unreferenced points with no evidence behind them, to support their argument. There is too much of it!!!
|
|
|
|